Write the paragraph we discussed on Monday. Make sure to have an argumentative topic sentence. Use the sources to provide evidence for your own point of view in a well-developed paragraph. Integrate the sources as evidence for your argument. Downshift.
Post your paragraph as a comment below by Thursday at 5 PM. We'll discuss some of your paragraphs on Friday.
Colleges should, in the interests of both players and academic standards, outlaw the high-pressure tactics used by coaches when they recruit high school players for college teams. High-pressure recruiting has been going on for many years now. As described by Collier’s magazine in 1905, recruits were getting paid to play single games and allowed to play even with insufficient amounts of credits. Today recruiting has reached an all time high as far as intensity and it isn’t all for the best. “Recruiting is getting to be cancerous,” said Dale Brown of Louisiana State University. By cancerous, it is presumable he is referring to both the fact that it is spreading very quickly and also the fact that it is getting worse and worse. Although recruiting has reached this all time high, it must be recognized this is essential for most, if not all sports and schools to be successful. As Steve Sloan of Texas Tech described it, “recruiting is the crux of building a championship football team.” Although recruiting is becoming high-pressured, recruiting is a necessity and legendary University of Alabama football coach describes it best when he says, “You don’t out-coach people, you out-recruit them.”
ReplyDeleteColleges should outlaw the high-pressure tactics used by coaches when they recruit high school players for college teams, because it is in the best interests of both players and coaches. Recruiting is becoming increasingly popular and college sports. Former head basketball coach of Louisiana State University, Dale Brown, describes recruiting as being "cancerous," referring to both its rapid uprise in college and its negative impact. In fact, former Texas Tech football coach, Steve Sloan, claimed that every college coach must realize the importance of recruiting, or face the "alumni firing squad." Although the job of coaching is important, recruiting is now becoming a necessity. Washington Post sports columnist, Kenneth Denlinger explains this phenomenon by stating that a "tactician without talented players is a man soon without a job." Plenty of coaches realize how the pressure of recruiting is spiraling out of control, but no coach is willing to change the system, because of the risk of losing their job.
ReplyDeleteColleges should, in the interests of both players and academic standards, outlaw the high-pressure tactics used by coaches when they recruit high school players for college teams. The pressure coaches have to improve their college team has been getting greater than ever. Students are entering college for the sole purpose of playing a sport and not being a "student." These players have a great opportunity to get an education as well as playing a sport. Instead, many of the players have a high demand by their coaches to play a sport and with do not care about their academics or do not have time. According to the Carnegie Foundation, "American college athletics are too much commercialism and a negligent attitude towards the educational opportunity for which the college exists." There needs to be an epidemic to stop this problem, and this is an issue that has been prevalent since the early 1900's. According to Collier's magazine, in 1905 players were entering college before they graduated high school. In addition, players were getting paid to enter a single game. College institutions need to enforce that getting a college education is more important than playing on a sport's team. Colleges should ease off the high pressure that they implement in coaches, so an institution can serve its main purpose - education.
ReplyDeleteColleges should, in the interests of both players and academic standards, outaw the high-pressure tactics used by coaches when they recruit high school players for college teams. Recruiting has become a very critical part of becoming a coach, in order to have success the coach needs to bring in a lot of talented young athletes. Even one of the most respected football coaches, Paul “bear” Bryant said, “You don’t out-coach people [;] you out-recruit them.” This has led to many athletes getting into college without sufficient credits and going for the purpose of sports and not for academics. Colliers magazine, in 1905 said that “… Leo Dentry, entered school before he even graduated.” This brings a negative attitude toward thw opportunities that colleges provide for each of their students. Unfortunately, recruiting has become such a vital part of the collegiate sports that sometimes coaches are even evaluated on how they recruit and can lose their jobs if they do not bring enough success to their programs.
ReplyDeleteColleges should, in the interests of both players and academic standards, outlaw the high-pressure tactics used by coaches when they recruit high school players for college teams. The amount of heat that is placed on coaches has increased dramatically because college athletics function as a minor, or preparatory, league for some professional sport , particularly football and basketball, but there is nothing minor about american’s passion for them or about the sums of money intercollegiate sports generate.According to Collier's magazine, in 1905 players were entering college before they graduated high school. In addition,players were getting paid to enter a single game. this is also exemplify in today’s sports world as students are offered full scholarships before they have taken their first College Boards, or even the Preliminary SAT exams. with these method “ recruiting is getting to be cancerous” and the coach are “creating monsters”. Universities needs to redirect there focus back to education because at the end of a game and a career, education will always be there.
ReplyDeleteGlobal Warming
ReplyDeleteFollowing the industrial revolution, humanity has developed ingenious methods to create and consume energy through fossil fuels. The consumption of these recourses creates fumes called green house gasses, such as carbon dioxide, which then get trapped in the earths atmosphere, and warming the the earths surface. This process is known as global warming, and has become a topic of debate amongst the worlds most powerful countries, including their governments. More importantly however, is the virtually unanimous agreement within the international scientific community, that global warming is in fact happening. The argument that this phenomenon is not real, or that it is not occurring at as fast a rate as scientist say it is, when faced with these examples, is absolutely ludicrous. Polar ice caps are melting causing the see levels to rise around the globe. Both the Artic and Antarctic are shrinking in size, reducing their surface areas which help reflect sunlight, preventing the earths surface from getting any warmer. One of the most noticeable changes caused by global warming is climate change. Regions who are typically mild in weather are experiencing harsh summers, while other regions that are topically warm, are experiencing a drop in temperature. Typhoons and hurricanes are becoming more frequent, and in some cases come in recorded sizes. Scientist believe that if the average temperature of the earths surface increases only by 2 degrees, climate change will increase at an even more alarming rate. However, even when they are shown these observable facts, governments fail to reduce their consumption of fossil fuels, sacrificing the wellbeing of the planet for economic growth. Political scientist Dr. S. Kay states in his book Global Security, that “unchecked global warming over an extended period could pose one of the most serious threats to international security that humanity has ever experienced.” Governments need to realize that the time to intervene has come, and that economic growth is no longer their top priority.
The emphasis that college athletic programs place on recruitment detracts attention from the main purpose of attending college to receive a strong education; therefore, laws must be enforced to eliminate over recruiting high school players. The stress that coaches place on recruitment leads athletes to believe that academics are less important than athletics. For example, the Carnegie Foundation emphasizes that Americans give too much attention to college athletic programs; thus, athletes gain “a negligent attitude towards the educational opportunity for which the college exists.” Students have been accepted, even by means of cheating, into colleges based off of athletic achievements rather than merit abilities. For instance, Collier’s magazine, in 1905, reported that a football player “enrolled at Chicago three credits short of the entrance requirements”, and the player’s teammate entered the college prior to graduating high school. Colleges need to refocus students’ attention on the academic opportunities and strengths provided by each college rather than the athletic opportunities.
ReplyDeleteI do think that coaching is important, but I also think that recruiting is a much needed necessity because you want athletes that are coachable. It does not matter if you were the most winningest coach the world has ever known, because they know the players that won you that championship. What does matter is that you have recruits that can receive criticism well. In other words, according to legendary Alabama football coach Paul Bryant: "You do not out-coach people you out-recruit them" Yes having a good coach is great, but it is the players who execute the orders given by the coach. It is also in how you recruit them that make or break a coaches "dream season". You do not use high-pressure tactics, bribes, or a promised spot on the team to coax him or put in a position where he would feel threatened to the point where he felt as though he couldn't go anywhere else. However, you do tell them that we would love to have them but you also HAVE to inform them that they are there to receive an education, not just to play sports.
ReplyDeleteRecruiting has become an essential component of attracting young and talented athletes to play on collegiate sports teams. Unfortunately, high-pressure tactics of coaches’ force high school athletes to make drastic decisions that could potentially blight their future careers. The Carnegie Foundation in 1929 described American collegiate athletics as “too much commercialism and a negligent attitude towards the educational opportunity for which college exists.” Some coaches recruit their athletes for the sole purpose of keeping their team successful athletically, and less emphasis on an education which is what college prepares students for real world careers. According to the Collier’s magazine, athletes such as Walter Eckersall, All-American quarterback, “enrolled to Chicago three credits short of the entrance requirement” and his teammate, Leo Detray “entered the school before he even graduated high school.” Recruiting athletes that are not even eligible are admitted to college purely to play sports goes to show that athletics are more important than a college education. Dale Brown of Louisiana State University describes athletics are “creating a monster. Recruiting is getting to be cancerous,” implying that these recruiting patterns are becoming increasingly more popular with collegiate coaches and this problem needs to be addressed as a serious problem. Even though recruiting is required to bring talented athletes to keep collegiate teams successful, coaches should not ignore college requirements and education just so then an athlete can play a sport for four years.
ReplyDeleteIn order to allow students to focus on their academics, which is the main purpose of college, those institutions should prohibit coaches from high-pressure recruitment of high school players. Today, coaches seem to recruit players for the sake of themselves, not the students. For example, if coaches do not recruit a championship-winning team, they will “face the alumni firing squad,” according to Steve Sloan, Texas Tech football coach. In reality, those methods of recruiting only prevents college students from earning a proper education. Coaches, who should be another source of support for their players, should help them balance both academics and sports, not just athletics. According to sports journalist Joseph Durso, it is not uncommon that high school players enroll into college, even though they are not qualified. For example, Walter Eckersall, a quarterback at Chicago, enrolled despite the fact that he was three credits short. In addition, Eckersall’s teammate, Leo Detray, became a student of Chicago though he was still in high school. Overall, coaches who use recruiting to build a “championship football team,” devalue the purpose of education because students are not able to focus on their academics. Those players were not even able to focus on their academics before entering college because of the coaches’ harsh recruiting tactics.
ReplyDeleteColleges should outlaw the high-pressure tactics used by coaches when they recruit high school players for college teams, because, in the end neither coaches nor players gain anything positive under such extreme circumstances. The amount of stress and pressure that is placed on athletes, when trying to get recruited, tells the athletes that their sport is of higher importance than school and a students academics. Recruiting athletes, under these circumstances, causes colleges to care more about making money rather than focus on educating their student athlete. Dale Brown, former basketball coach at Louisiana State University, describes recruiting as being “cancerous.” Brown means that todays recruitment tactics are very damaging and problematic to the educational system. Recruiting is obviously a very important thing for college sports. But, recruitment styles today are putting too much pressure on only sports, and no focus on academics.
ReplyDeleteColleges should, in the interests of both players academic standards, outlaw the high-pressure tactics used by coaches when they recruit high school players for college teams. "You don't out-coach people [;] you out-recruit them" says Paul Bryant (Coach Bear), till recently the winningest coach in college football history. While it is reasonable to feel disgust at how student-athletes are treated like they are pieces of inventory in a strategy based video game, it is important to see that given the system, it is the most profitable way. These days, so much is invested in college football and so much is expected of those students by members of their community. It has come so far from being a fun competition based on building unity between schools. And by treating these competitions like they were the state of nature described by Hobbes, colleges have come to arm themselves to the teeth through recruitment of students and coaches. In this world there doesn't seem to be any restrictions, in fact, Joseph Durso documents cases where colleges recruited students through less than legal means. University of Chicago admitted Walter Eckersall and his teammate Leo Detray before they had even graduated high school. Durso also implies that these students are asked to cheat to win. "A quarterback and an end also from Minnesota admitted shaving points during the 1903 Beloit game" (Durso, 1905.) And here, the coaches themselves might be to blame but they do not seem to have much choice either. Steve Sloan of Texas Tech says that coaches who fail to recognize that recruiting the best players is the key to championships face the "alumni firing squad." Does this mean that the evil of college football is shadowy and without any singular root cause? Not likely. The Carnegie Foundation in 1929 traced the defects of college athletics in the US to "too much commercialism and a negligent attitude towards the educational opportunity for which the college exists" and fittingly, the only panacea for fixing US college football is to get much of the money out and treat the student-athletes as students first, recruited based solely on their desire and ability to grasp knowledge and athletes second.
ReplyDeleteColleges should, in the interest of both players and academic standards, outlaw the high-pressure tactics used by coaches when they recruit high school players for college teams. These high-pressure tactics have led to students being recruited merely for the sake of bringing more talent to the sports field. Both perspective student-athletes and coaches are put under immense pressure to be top notch. Paul “Bear” Bryant, one of University of Alabama’s best football coaches once stated, “you don’t out-coach people [;] you out-recruit them.” This shows that one of college football’s best coaches knows that his skills as a recruiter are more important than his skills as a coach. According to Collier’s Magazine in 1905, colleges care so much about the commercial aspects that they recruited students who were not qualified to be an academic student at those schools. The problem with this type of recruiting was acknowledged by the Carnegie Foundation in 1929 when they expressed that recruiting causes colleges to care more about the money than “the educational opportunity” that college was founded on. With these facts, it is clear that the ways of recruiting need to become more focused on finding students with academic potential and a desire to learn rather than athletic potential with a will to play. Colleges do not need to change their sports culture, but students who want to play need to first “step up their game” in the classroom.
ReplyDeleteRecruiting has become a huge problem in all sports at all colleges around the United States. Now a days college sports has been all about money and now all high school students want to do is get recruited and make the big bucks in professional sports. Even some college football coaches have even seen that recruiting has become all about the sport and not at all about athletics. The Carnegie Foundation said it the best, "The fundamental causes of the defects in American college athletics are too much commercialism and negligent attitude towards the education opportunity for which the college exists." This quote is exactly what college sports does and it does not help the student athlete in any way. The way recruiting is being run only benefits the very talented athletes because they have a change to do something with their skills compared to the less skilled students who went to a school with low academics to play a sport that they may never play again after their four years. It is hard to blame anyone in this situation because everyone in this situation is to blame, the parents, student athletes, college coaches, and colleges. Nothing good comes from this type of recruiting, and it hurts everyone involved.
ReplyDeleteColleges should, in the interest of both players and academic standards, outlaw the high-pressure tactics used by coaches when they recruit high school players for colleges. Although this tactic is helping the athletics, it takes away from the real reason for attending the institution: getting an education. Carnegie Foundation explained, in 1929, that schools care more about the money they make off of athletics than the education of the players. Coaches are pulling strings to get good players, who aren’t even eligible, to go to their college. While a player’s career in college may lead to a career in the professionals, their bodies will never hold up long enough usually to support them the rest of their lives. Those players will need their education to fall back on which would be a huge problem if they never received a proper one. Steve Sloan of Texas Tech had stated that if a coach doesn’t recruit good enough players they will have to “…face the alumni firing squad.” Its understandable that alumni would want good sports teams to bring in money for their alma mater but if the schools education level suffers because of the athletes their bringing in, no non-athletes will go. Although athletics may be a big draw to a school, in the end, it all comes down to the education they give.
ReplyDeleteOver many decades, many people have had concerns about "too much commercialism" of American college athletics as Carnegie Foundation pointed out in 1929. According to a former football coach at Texas Tech, Steve Sloan, coaches who fail in recruiting the best players "face the alumni firing squad." Therefore, coaches have to either compete with other coaches for living or consider changing their job. Having said that, without structural reform or coaches' quitting their job, there won't be liberation from sickening recruitments.
ReplyDeleteColleges should eliminate high-pressure tactics when coaches are looking for recruits to participate in college sports. When you are a talented athlete colleges tend to overlook the academic status that you have. There are people who get into Ivy League schools who don't have the grades, but are just really talented at say football. But what happens when they actually attend an Ivy league college? Can they keep up academically, because they only got in with their athletic ability. Colleges should take in consideration what students have to offer academically, and also their athletic talents.
ReplyDeleteColleges should, in the interests of both players and academic standards, outlaw the high-pressure tactics used by coaches when they recruit high school players for college teams. Recruiting always has been, is, and always will be very important to college athletics. Although every team’s goal is to recruit, every style is different. J. Robert Evans says, “There is recruiting in various degrees in every intercollegiate sport….” Recruitment is essential to every college sport, but sometimes it can get out of control. Recruitment can make or break teams, and coaches need to watch the manner in which he or she recruits. Athletics will always be important, but can cause trouble. Dale Brown of Louisiana State University agrees, and writes, “Athletics is creating a monster. Recruiting is getting to be cancerous.” Hopefully athletics will always exist at the college level, and the level of recruitment can be more relaxed.
ReplyDeleteRecruiting players has become a popular tactic in building a strong winning team. Lately in the sports industry there has been more and more emphasis on recruiting and less emphasis on coaching like it has been in the past. Nowadays it is common for students to choose their higher education based of being recruited for sports instead of academics. In addition, coaches often stress on athletes to make their sport their number one priority not what their education which is how it should be. This causes a contrast between academic integrity and creating a winning sports team. According to Paul Bryant, you don’t out-coach people you out-recruit them”. This only emphasizes that recruiting good players, plays an extremely important role in college sports and the recruitment process.
ReplyDeleteColleges should, in the interests of both players and academic standards, outlaw the high-pressure tactics used by coaches when they recruit high school players for college teams. The more and more pressure that is put on both the athletes to rise to their recruiters unbelieveable expectations and to rise to the expectations set by the university they're attending. Ivy League athletes, whose sole purpose in life so far has been to either throw a lacrosse ball or tackle a quarterback, are not going to be able to meet the rigorous academic expectations set by the top 1% of universities. Some colleges have attempted to combat this by instating "for athlete" classes, but all that manages to do is segregate serious students and athletes. By reducing the role that recruiting plays in college athletics, colleges can help their players build better lives and futures for themselves.
ReplyDelete